Spotlights
Parliamentary system, single-term Presidency signpost hard choices before Nigerians
After the return to the old national anthem, which is now ironically the “new national anthem,” Nigerians face additional significant decisions.
Sixty members of the House of Representatives are rallying prominent Nigerians to support a shift from the current presidential system to a parliamentary system, which they argue is less costly and less cumbersome. In February, these lawmakers sponsored three bills to amend the 1999 Constitution to implement this change by 2031. The bills are: Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (Alteration) Bill, 2024 (HB.1115); Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (Alteration) Bill, 2024 (HB.1116); and Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (Alteration) Bill, 2024 (HB.1117).
At a press briefing following the presentation of these bills, their spokesman, Abdussamad Dasuki, highlighted the cross-party and regional collaboration behind the proposal.
He argued that the current presidential system, modelled after the United States, still retains characteristics of military rule, making the Nigerian president one of the most powerful in the world.
Dasuki cited high governance costs and excessive executive powers as major flaws of the presidential system.
“No wonder the Nigerian president appears to be one of the most powerful presidents in the world. Over the years, the imperfections of the presidential system of government have become glaring, despite several alterations to the constitution to address the shortcomings of a system that has denied the nation the opportunity to attain its full potential,” Dasuki remarked.
He elaborated on the high cost of governance under the current system, which leaves fewer resources for crucial areas like infrastructure, education and healthcare, thereby hindering national development. The excessive powers vested in executive members, who are appointees and not directly accountable to the people, were also highlighted as a significant issue.
“Our founders, in their wisdom and in a political atmosphere devoid of compulsion, considered the interests of their native peoples and their desire to live together in a country where truth and justice reign, where no man is oppressed, and where all citizens live in peace and plenty. They adopted the parliamentary system of government, which was the governance system of the First Republic. For six years while it was in operation, the system worked for the country,” Dasuki said.
The lawmakers have initiated broader consultations with key stakeholders in the country, having met with former President Olusegun Obasanjo, Alhaji Aminu Dantata, Professor Ango Abdullahi, and other influential figures who have expressed support for the proposal.
Earlier this week, another group of over 30 members of the House of Representatives proposed a single six-year term for the president and governors, as well as a proposition for two vice presidents, alongside other electoral reforms. The members, under the aegis of ‘Reform Minded Lawmakers’, detailed their proposals in 50 bills presented before the House for amendment.
At a press conference, spokesman Rep. Ikenga Imo Ugochinyere emphasised the urgent need for constitutional and electoral reforms to address Nigeria’s ongoing issues since independence. He highlighted the group’s commitment to reducing governance costs, ensuring equity and combating corruption through legislative instruments.
“We are a group of over 30 reform-minded lawmakers from different political parties committed to ensuring a working Nigeria using legislative instruments within our power. We aim to ensure the reduction of the cost of governance and campaigns; unite our country, ensure a seamless transition, continuity, uninterrupted development, justice, equity, independence of INEC, efficient use of state resources, and tackle nepotism, state capture, and corruption in electoral processes,” Ugochinyere said.
The lawmakers proposed several significant reforms, including the constitutional alteration to provide for the rotation of executive powers among the six geopolitical zones, the recognition of the division of Nigeria into six geopolitical zones, and a single six-year tenure for the president and governors.
These changes aim to reduce government spending, increase efficiency in governance, and provide national stability.
Among the proposed amendments is the creation of two vice presidents’ offices to emerge from the southern and northern parts of Nigeria. The first vice president would be a succession vice president, while the second would be a minister in charge of the economy.
Another proposed amendment is that of financial autonomy and accountability of local government councils by prescribing an independent consolidated local government council account and imposing long-term imprisonment for any misuse of local government funds.
There are also amendments to ensure state governments remit allocations to local government councils within their jurisdiction, with penalties for non-compliance. These, however, may be belated if the federal government succeeds in its suit against the state governments now before the Supreme Court to secure an order granting full autonomy to the local governments.
Ugochinyere further stressed the necessity of electoral reforms to improve Nigeria’s democratic processes. These include: conducting all elections (presidential, governorship, National Assembly, state houses of assembly and local governments) on the same day; ensuring election results align with the list of accredited voters and the B-VAS machine; and holding INEC officers accountable for declaring false results through civil and criminal actions.
Others are resolving all election-related litigations before the winners are sworn into office and making all election-related documents and materials available to those who participated in elections and who have reason to question the outcomes.
The lawmakers acknowledged the significant challenges facing Nigeria, including economic hardship, insecurity, disunity, weak institutions, corruption and wastage of state resources. They stressed the critical phase Nigeria is in and the importance of their reform efforts for the country’s survival as a political and economic unit.
Experts and civil society organisations (CSOs) have, however, expressed mixed reactions to the proposals.
Dr Abubakar Kyari of the University of Abuja opposes both the return to parliamentary system and the single six-year term, arguing that governance issues stem from implementation rather than system structure.
“I am not convinced by the reasons advanced by the canvassers of this particular position. They have mentioned the issue of cost. I think the issue of cost is just a matter of the implementers and not the system. No matter what system of government is operated, as long as there are no checks and balances, or as long as there are no deliberate attempts to ensure that officials of government do not turn the public treasury into their own personal treasury, there will be profligacy and unnecessary spending of resources,” Kyari said.
He further critiqued the idea of returning to regionalism, questioning how the regions of 1960–1966 could be relevant today. He also argued that the current geopolitical zones do not reflect present realities and that any such move would be impractical.
His position on the parliamentary system of government reiterated that earlier espoused by Professor Auwalu Yadudu, a renowned constitutional lawyer.
In an earlier interview with Daily Trust, Yadudu said with the current situation in Nigeria, a return to the parliamentary system of government may become a recipe for inertia and chaos.
“You simply don’t know what exactly the parliamentary system will throw out for you, because I can imagine the kind of instability, political inertia, and even the total chaos in the country if you were to go for parliamentary system of government, which is so prone to instability, and given our ethnic, religious and geopolitical differences, I don’t see people really minding their business and allowing the system to work for five years,” he said.
On his part, Mallam Auwal Musa Rafsanjani, Executive Director of Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC), spoke on the need for democratic, transparent and inclusive power rotation at both federal and state levels.
He warned against federal overreach into state affairs, as exemplified by the Kano State emirate crisis, which he argued undermined state rights.
“In addition to the rotational presidency and governorship positions, Nigerians are demanding that a five-year single term be adopted to create political stability and inclusion for now,” Rafsanjani said.
Also, Comrade Ibrahim Zikirullahi, Executive Director of Resource Centre for Human Rights and Civic Education (CHRICED), called for caution and vigilance regarding the proposed bills, questioning the motives behind their initiation.
While supporting some aspects, such as the single tenure and financial autonomy for local governments, he raised concerns about expanding bureaucracy with the introduction of two vice presidents and the implications for the electoral cycle.
“Conducting two different elections for the legislative and executive arms will not only erode the gains from reducing the election cycle for the president and governors by two years but will further increase the overall cost of elections,” Zikirullahi noted.
Thus, while the proposed constitutional and electoral reforms by Nigerian lawmakers aim to address critical governance and political issues, they have sparked significant debate among experts and civil society. The discussions and consultations continue as Nigeria navigates these complex political reforms, with the potential for a substantial impact on the country’s future.
Source: Dailytrust
Former military head of state, General Abdulsalami Abubakar (rtd), has passionately urged the citizens of Nigeria to set aside their differences and unify in the defense of their nation’s sovereignty.
His call to action came in light of alarming statements made by former US President Donald Trump, which Abubakar characterized as a serious threat to the hard-earned unity of Nigeria.
Over the weekend, Trump reignited a contentious debate regarding Nigeria’s pressing security issues by once again designating the country as a “country of particular concern.”
In a statement released on Friday, Trump made shocking claims about the state of affairs in Nigeria, asserting that the nation was enduring what he termed a “Christian genocide.”
He went on to accuse the Nigerian government of failing in its duty to protect Christians from violent attacks carried out by “Islamic terrorists.”
Abubakar’s response underscores the importance of solidarity among Nigerians in the face of external criticisms and challenges.
He went further to threaten military action, saying: “The USA will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria, and may very well go into that now disgraced country ‘guns-a-blazing’, to completely wipe out the Islamic terrorists killing Christians.”
The remark has sparked global concern and speculation about the possibility of direct US military involvement in Nigeria, one of Washington’s oldest allies in Africa.
Speaking in a telephone interview from London on Monday, Abdulsalami warned that Trump’s words could endanger Nigeria’s peace if not carefully managed.
He called on citizens to remain united, stressing that the moment demands “unity, wisdom, and diplomacy” rather than anger or division.
“Unity, wisdom, and diplomacy must take precedence over division and pride at this critical moment,” he said.
Abdulsalami also appealed to the United States to support Nigeria’s fight against insecurity through cooperation rather than threats.
According to him, “strategic dialogue” remains the most effective way to engage Washington and de-escalate the tension.
He added that Nigeria should rely on quiet diplomacy to resolve any misunderstandings and ensure that both countries continue to work together on shared security objectives.
It is clear that the United States’ frustration with the Nigerian government goes beyond reports of genocide.
The American President, Donald Trump, and Nigerian President Bola Tinubu have been engaged in a silent conflict for some time.
Trump has often been described as a “bully,” even by prominent politicians in the U.S. and around the world, due to his lawless and reckless leadership style, as noted by Barack Obama.
Trump has expressed discomfort with President Tinubu’s body language and has been critical of certain policies.
In turn, President Tinubu retaliated against some of Trump’s decisions regarding Nigeria.
The beginning of Trump’s anger – BRICS Partnership
President Donald Trump’s anger began when Nigeria was formally admitted as a BRICS partner country in January 2025 under Brazil’s presidency.
At the 17th BRICS Summit in Rio de Janeiro, President Bola Tinubu reaffirmed Nigeria’s commitment to the grouping, which also includes powerhouses like Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa and newer members such as Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Indonesia.
This comes after Brazilian president and the current chairman of BRICS, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, condemned the Trump administration’s worldwide tariff increase imposed on almost all countries around the world.
Trump was quick to respond to his Brazilian counterpart’s comments, imposing additional 10 per cent tariffs on BRICS and its partners, which he has repeatedly warned against engaging in anti-American policies.
Trump had imposed a 14 per cent reciprocity tariff on Nigeria in April 2025, which became the ninth BRICS partner country in January 2025 and additional 10 per cent over its alliance with the developing nations’ bloc. Nigeria’s affiliation with the BRICS nations further anger the American leader.
President Tinubu responded with calm, saying that his administration will remain resilient and has no fear of the trade policy direction of U.S. President Donald Trump, particularly tariffs targeting Nigerian exports.
Tinubu said, “If non-oil revenue is growing, then we have no fear of whatever Trump is doing on the other side.”
This response clearly provoked more anger from Trump.
The anger lingered more as President Donald Trump ignored Nigeria, only to invite five other African nations to discuss ” Commercial Opportunities”.
Trump hosted five African leaders from Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mauritania, and Senegal at the White House to discuss “commercial opportunities” on July 9, 2025.
Nigeria was not among the nations invited, even though, the criteria for the invitation were not clear.
After hitting Nigeria with a 14% tariff, the U.S. faced similar backlash as President Tinubu retaliated with a ban on 25 American goods, leaving Trump to complain about the response.
Following the ban on 25 imported items from the United States of America to Nigeria, there were strong indications that Donald Trump’s government may retaliate by blacklisting more Nigerian products.
The development comes as the country imported about $643.1 million worth of goods from Nigeria between January and February 2025 before the implementation of the new tariffs by the Trump government.
Trump’s administration quickly criticised Nigeria’s longstanding import ban on 25 product categories, warning that the policy undermines American exporters and blocks access to one of Africa’s largest consumer markets.
Nigeria refuses to accept Venezuelan deportees from the US
Tinubu’s government again rejected Trump’s proposal of accepting deportees from the United States, distancing itself from decisions by countries like Rwanda, Eswatini and South Sudan that have agreed to receive foreign nationals expelled from the United States of America.
Trump reacted again with another policy to target Nigerian citizens
After Nigeria had rejected being the country of deportees from the United States, the US tightens visa rules for Nigerians, scrutinises applicants’ social media accounts.
The latest rule by the US as the Trump administration intensifies immigration crackdown, mainly targeting African countries like Nigeria.
The US has announced a new visa rule for Nigerians, requiring all applicants to disclose their social media usernames and handles from the past five years for vetting.
‘‘Omitting social media information could lead to visa denial and ineligibility for future visas,’’ the US Embassy in Nigeria said in a statement on X on Monday, adding that visa applicants are ‘‘required to list all social media usernames or handles of every platform they have used from the last 5 years on the DS-160 visa application form.’’
Meanwhile, Human rights activist Omoyele Sowore has warned Nigerians that the threat by the administration of United States President Donald Trump to invade Nigeria militarily should not be regarded as a welcome development.
Trump had warned that if the Nigerian government fails to tackle the alleged massacre of Christians, the US military would intervene to target those allegedly persecuting Christians.
The development has generated mixed reactions, with some stakeholders, particularly Christians, celebrating Trump’s move.
However, Sowore, in a statement on Sunday, cautioned that the threat should not be celebrated, explaining that a military intervention could cause more harm to the nation.
According to him, the US President “does not care about Nigerians, not Christians, Muslims, or anyone else.”
Sowore stressed that the nation’s deliverance will “never come from abroad; it must come from within, through real leadership, not the Tinubus of this world, and national renewal.”
The statement reads: “The latest threat by US President Donald Trump @POTUS to launch military action in Nigeria, allegedly to protect Christians, may sound appealing to some. Still, history has shown this to be perilous.
Whether you are Christian, Muslim, animist, or non-religious, no one should celebrate such rhetoric. The United States and its allies have a long record of military interventions that leave nations more unstable than before.
They failed to secure peace in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, or Syria, and they will not bring salvation to Nigeria through bombs or boots on the ground.
What Nigeria truly needs is not a foreign savior, but legitimate accountable leadership, one that protects all citizens, upholds justice, and ends the cycles of corruption and violence that have left the nation broken.”
The clash between Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and Senate President Godswill Akpabio continues to intensify, as new court charges have emerged that could have significant repercussions for the supporters of the Kogi State Senator.
In a recent development, the Office of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and the Minister of Justice has publicly defended the legitimacy of the defamation charges that were filed against Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan.
The AGF emphasized that these charges were instituted in strict accordance with the provisions outlined in the Penal Code Law of Nigeria as well as the country’s Constitution. This assertion suggests that the legal proceedings are being pursued with a clear adherence to established legal frameworks, potentially setting the stage for a high-profile court battle that may draw further public interest and scrutiny.
As the situation unfolds, the implications for both political figures and their respective supporters will likely become more pronounced in the coming weeks.
The AGF’s office stated this in its response to the senator’s preliminary objection to the three-count criminal charge pending before the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, Maitama, presided over by Justice Chizoba Oji.
The charges against Akpoti-Uduaghan, who represents Kogi Central Senatorial District, stemmed from petitions filed by Senate President Godswill Akpabio and former Kogi State governor, Yahaya Bello, following her public claims that the duo had conspired to assassinate her.
AGF Insists Charges Are Lawful
In its counter-affidavit, the AGF’s office maintained that the decision to prosecute the senator was taken after a comprehensive investigation by the Nigeria Police Force, which reviewed all petitions from both the complainants and the defendant.
“The three counts were preferred against the defendant pursuant to the Penal Code Law of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and in the bona fide exercise of the prosecutorial powers of the Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation as guaranteed under the Constitution,” the prosecution stated.Legal consultation services
It further argued that the senator’s actions contravened provisions of the law, stressing that the case was filed “in the public interest, the interest of justice, and to prevent abuse of legal process.”
According to the AGF’s office, the charges were neither politically motivated nor an abuse of prosecutorial power.
“The criminal charge against the defendant arose from the comprehensive and conclusive investigation of the case, including all petitions and parties involved, by the Nigeria Police Force.”
“The charge against the defendant is consistent with extant laws and does not constitute an abuse of the legal or prosecutorial powers of the Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation,” the document read.
Defendant Challenges AGF’s Powers
At the last sitting on September 23, defence counsel Ehighioge West-Idahosa (SAN) had filed a preliminary objection challenging the validity of the charges.
He argued that the AGF’s office had overreached its constitutional powers, describing the prosecution as an abuse of process.
According to him, the objection was not contesting the facts of the case but rather the legality and jurisdictional competence of the AGF to initiate such charges.
The objection, filed on September 18, was yet to receive a response from the prosecution at the time of the previous hearing.
Prosecution Seeks Adjournment for Proper Service
When the matter came up on Monday, prosecuting counsel David Kaswe informed the court that although the case was slated for hearing, the prosecution’s counter-affidavit had not been properly served on the defence.
He explained that the document was delivered to an incorrect address and requested a short adjournment to rectify the error.
“It would not be fair for the prosecution to proceed when the defence has indicated its intention to respond to our counter,” Kaswe told the court.
Responding, West-Idahosa confirmed that the defence team had not been served and would only respond after receiving the document. He also requested a longer adjournment, citing plans by the defence team to attend the International Bar Association (IBA) Conference in Canada.
After listening to both sides, Justice Oji granted the request and adjourned the matter to December 1, 2025, for hearing of the preliminary objection.
Background of the Case
The case, marked FCT/HC/CR/297/25, accuses Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan of making harmful and defamatory statements against Akpabio and Bello, including allegations that they plotted to assassinate her and that the Senate President was linked to the death of Miss Iniobong Umoren.
The senator was arraigned on June 19 and pleaded not guilty to all three counts.
The court is expected to rule on her preliminary objection before proceeding to trial.
Meanwhile, the Senator representing Kogi Central has alleged that her international passport has been withheld.
She alleged that she had been prevented from travelling.
The lawmaker made the allegation in a live Facebook broadcast on Tuesday morning.
According to her, “having completed the celebration of my second year, I decided to take a week off and my passport is being withheld again. The same thing happened.
“I have committed no offense and there is no order from the court to seize my passport and deny me traveling.
“The last time it happened, the officer in charge told us that the Senate President Godswill Akpabio instructed them to withhold my passport and prevent me from traveling”.
Tanzanian President Samia Suluhu Hassan was to be inaugurated on Monday, with the internet still blocked after election protests in which the opposition says hundreds were killed by security forces.
The electoral commission says Hassan won 98 per cent of the vote.
But the main opposition party, Chadema, which was barred from competing, has rejected the results and called for fresh elections, calling last Wednesday’s vote a “sham”.
State television said the public would not attend the inauguration, which would be held in the State House in the capital, Dodoma, rather than at a stadium as usual.
A total internet blackout has been in place since protests broke out on election day, so only a trickle of verifiable information has been getting out of the East African country.
A diplomatic source said there were credible reports of hundreds — perhaps even thousands — of deaths registered at hospitals and health clinics around Tanzania.
Chadema told AFP it had recorded “no less than 800” deaths by Saturday, but none of the figures could be independently verified.
The government has not commented on any deaths, except to reject accusations that “excessive force” was used.
Schools and colleges remained closed on Monday, with public transport halted.
The diplomatic source said there were “concerning reports” that police were using the internet blackout to buy time as they “hunt down opposition members and protesters who might have videos” of atrocities committed last week.
Dar es Salaam and other cities were much calmer over the weekend as a near-total lockdown was in place.
An AFP reporter said police were stopping almost everyone who moved around the city, checking IDs and bags, and allowing shops to open only in the afternoon.
AFP journalists on the island of Zanzibar — which has greater political freedom and saw few protests — saw masked armed men patrolling without visible insignia or identification in the days after the election.
A rights group in neighbouring Kenya presented gruesome footage on Sunday that it said was gathered from inside Tanzania, including images of dead bodies piled up in the street.
The images could not be independently verified.
Pope Leo XIV on Sunday called for prayers for Tanzania, where he said post-election violence had erupted “with numerous victims”.
“I urge everyone to avoid all forms of violence and to pursue the path of dialogue,” the pope said.
– ‘Wave of terror’ –
Hassan was elevated from vice-president on the sudden death of her predecessor, John Magufuli, in 2021.
She wanted an emphatic election victory to cement her place and silence critics within the ruling party, analysts say.
Rights groups say she oversaw a “wave of terror” ahead of the vote, including a string of high-profile abductions that escalated in the final days.
Despite a heavy security presence, election day descended into chaos as crowds took to the streets across the country, tearing down her posters and attacking police and polling stations, leading to an internet shutdown and curfew.
Polling stations had been largely empty before the violence broke out, AFP journalists and observers saw, though the electoral commission later said turnout was 87 per cent.
UN chief Antonio Guterres was “deeply concerned” about the situation in Tanzania, “including reports of deaths and injuries during the demonstrations”, his spokesman said last week.
Punch
The Nigerian Education Loan Fund has announced that applications for the student loan scheme have surpassed one million, marking one of the largest uptakes for a government-backed social intervention since the beginning of the Tinubu administration.
In a statement on Sunday, the Director of Strategic Communications, Nigerian Education Loan Fund, Oseyemi Oluwatuyi, said the milestone was achieved less than a year after the programme was launched on May 24, 2024.
He described it as evidence that the scheme is gaining strong national traction and public trust.
According to the agency, over N116bn has so far been disbursed to students across universities, polytechnics, and colleges of education in Nigeria, covering both institutional charges and upkeep allowances.
The Managing Director of NELFUND, Akintunde Sawyerr, said the milestone reflects the success of President Bola Tinubu’s Renewed Hope agenda in expanding access to higher education.
“Crossing the one-million mark represents more than data; it symbolises renewed hope for a generation of Nigerians determined to rise above financial barriers to education,” Sawyerr said. “It is a testament to visionary leadership, sound policy design, and the collective effort of all stakeholders driving this transformative agenda.”
NELFUND reiterated its commitment to continuous improvement in service delivery, ensuring that “every qualified Nigerian student, regardless of background or location, can access education funding with transparency, efficiency, and dignity.”
The agency emphasised that the student loan programme is non-discriminatory, benefiting Nigerians across religious and ethnic backgrounds, and helping to promote unity through equal learning opportunities.
“NELFUND remains focused on ensuring that no Nigerian is denied the opportunity to learn, grow, or contribute to national progress because of financial limitations,” the statement added.
Spotlights
BREAKING: Tension As US Releases Video Of How American Military Will Storm Nigeria To Kill “Islamic Terrorists”
The United States (US) Department of War has released an artificial intelligence (AI) video simulating how it will storm Nigeria to kill “Islamic terrorists”.
The defence department of the US, which President Donald Trump renamed the Department of War, insinuated that it is “preparing for action” in Nigeria.
Dominik Tarczyński, a member of the European Parliament, shared the video on his verified X (formerly Twitter) handle late on Saturday night, November 1.
Tarczyński tweeted: “Nigerian Christians will be rescued very soon!”
Trump said on Saturday, November 1, had asked the Defence Department to prepare for possible “fast” military action in Nigeria if Africa’s most populous country fails to crack down on the killing of Christians.
DESOPADEC: Oborevwori Approves Release of ₦8.4bn To Clear Inherited Contract Debts
Oyo Commommerate War With British
Champions League: Why Dortmund Will Beat Man City Today
China Hits US Again! Extends Suspension Of Extra Tariffs On American Products
Genocide: China Backs Tinubu Amidst Trump’s Threat To Strike Nigeria
‘Tireless Liverpool’ Outclass Real Madrid At Anfield
Oborevwori Hails Banking Czar, Jim Ovia, At 74
Burna Boy Dumps Christianity To Search For Truth In Islam
Trump’s Threat: US Plots To Endanger Nigerians For Reasons – Ex-President Warns Citizens
INSIGHT: Five Major Reasons Donald Trump Angry With President Tinubu; What To Know
Spotlights2 days agoINSIGHT: Five Major Reasons Donald Trump Angry With President Tinubu; What To Know
- Spotlights4 days ago
From Petrol To Gold Resources: List Of Countries US Has Invaded, What Will Happen If Trump Strikes Nigeria
- Spotlights4 days ago
Alleged Coup Plot: Tension Grips Ex-Governor’s Associates; Over 30 People To Face Trial
- Spotlights4 days ago
Trump Threatens To Launch Attacks In Nigeria, Reasons Emerge
- News4 days ago
EXPOSED: (FULL LIST) Names Of People Behind Trump’s Threat To Tinubu Revealed
- Business3 days ago
JUST IN: Naira Breaks Fresh Record Against Dollar As New Rates Emerge
- Politics4 days ago
Mother Of All Betrayals: MURIC Reveals Who ‘Betrayed’ Tinubu To Trump
